Risk and war Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Risk and war - Essay Example The interpretation one can take of this game on personal finance comes in making conservative moves throughout the course of play. Just like a person lacking the funds to make large investments, those first beginning in the game should not make bold moves across the globe. Rather, diversifying in a few key areas, such as Australia or South America will offer bonuses of two extra armies, which will allow players to use the extra income to expand their holdings into investments overseas, such as Africa or Asia. This is where primary, secondary, and tertiary objectives come into play, which can also be thought of as short and long-term goals. After several attempts to win without a concrete strategy, the author began to conduct some research so as to conquer his opponents. This is where the concept of finances came to be found. The bonus armies at the start of each turn are one’s income, and where they are placed is asset allocation (Pascale, 2011). For those who spend all of the ir armies away in battle, destruction is near because the carelessness of one is the short-term strategy of another. In order to win, a strategy to gain and hold Australia was enacted, and another to expand into and gain control of Asia. This resulted in one of two ways for those who were still left on the board. They either attempted to cooperate with one another or they suffered the destruction of a force with far superior resources. The one result that did not occur was a smaller army siding with the larger one to guarantee survival, which is much more likely to occur in the real world of global domination, also referring to conflict, which occurs when differing forces, governments, or parties face off with one another as a result of discord that often relates to world affairs (Kegley, and Blanton, 376-377). Conflict was not actually the result of anything other than beginning to play the game since the object is to destroy each other while obtaining more land for oneself. Parlay ing off of this, one may have engaged in unplanned conflict if their monopoly on a continent was lost, such as a player making a strike from Mexico into South America. While the previous owner of the South American continent may not have wanted to go into battle with this particular army, he was perfectly content to do so in order to gain back what he had lost so as to maintain his position and have a better opportunity to grow his forces. Cooperation always fell between two parties who could not stand to fight on their own since doing so would result in heavier losses. However, by pooling their resources, they stood a slight chance of being able to bring down a far superior power if they agreed to do so before the hammer that came down had not gained so much weight that the momentum of its strikes were crushing rather than just painful. One historical event that seemed to play out is that there was never peace in the Middle East, which should not be entirely surprising as it is not only bordered by six territories in three continents, but also because for a person wanting control of Asia it is a necessary territory, and for those holding Africa, there is more security in pushing the opposition back. For any player wanting to get to Australia so as to gain control, or take it away from